Most brands don’t realize they have a deliverability problem until it’s already costing them revenue.

Emails are still sending.
Campaigns are still going out.
Flows are still “on.”

But performance quietly slips.

Open rates decline. Clicks soften. Attribution looks weaker. And the instinct is to blame creative, offers, or seasonality.

In reality, what’s usually happening is much simpler — and much harder to spot:

Inbox providers have stopped trusting your email program.

‍

Deliverability Doesn’t Fail Loudly

Deliverability doesn’t break the way a site outage does.

There’s no alert.
No warning.
No single moment where everything falls apart.

Instead, inbox providers like Gmail and Yahoo continuously evaluate your emails based on engagement behavior over time — especially early in the lifecycle.

When they see patterns like:

• Low engagement from new subscribers
• High-volume sends to disengaged users
• Inconsistent engagement across flows
  
  

They quietly downgrade your reputation.

And when that happens, your emails don’t stop sending — they just stop landing where they matter.

‍

Why Most Brands Chase the Wrong Fix

When performance drops, teams typically react by:

• Changing subject lines
• Sending more campaigns
• Running winback emails to cold subscribers
• Tweaking creative or offers
  
  

These actions often make the problem worse.

Because deliverability isn’t fixed by isolated changes.
It’s fixed by retraining inbox providers — deliberately and systematically — to see your emails as wanted again.

‍

Deliverability Is a System, Not a Setting

One of the biggest misconceptions we see is that deliverability is a technical checkbox.

Yes, authentication matters.
But once the basics are in place, engagement is the system.

What we’ve consistently observed across brands is this:

Deliverability issues almost always originate in one place — most often the welcome flow or early lifecycle emails — and then spread across the entire email program.

When inbox providers learn that new subscribers don’t engage, they apply that assumption everywhere:

• Campaigns
• Abandoned cart
• Post-purchase
• Winback
  
  

That’s why fixing one flow — when done correctly — can improve performance across all flows.

‍

The Only Reliable Way to Restore Inbox Placement

Deliverability recovery requires restraint, structure, and intention.

The approach that works looks like this:

1. Diagnose before acting — identify where engagement broke and when
   
   
2. Reduce volume strategically — stop sending to subscribers who are training inbox providers negatively
   
   
3. Start with your most engaged audience — rebuild trust where engagement is guaranteed
   
   
4. Expand gradually — letting engagement data dictate when it’s safe to scale
   
   
5. Monitor continuously — deliverability recovery compounds over time
   
   

This isn’t theory. It’s how inbox providers actually relearn trust.

‍

We Turned This Into a Repeatable Framework

Because this problem shows up again and again, we documented the full system we use with clients into a practical guide:

The Deliverability Recovery Framework

Inside the ebook, you’ll find:

• A quick diagnostic to determine whether deliverability is actually the issue
• A step-by-step recovery plan you can apply immediately
• A repeatable checklist to use whenever engagement declines
• Clear guardrails for when to expand — and when to pull back
  
  

This isn’t a collection of tactics or ESP settings.
It’s a system designed to help you restore inbox placement and protect it long-term.

‍

If Email Is a Meaningful Revenue Channel, This Matters

If email drives a meaningful portion of your revenue — or is supposed to — deliverability isn’t optional.

And if performance has softened without a clear explanation, chances are the issue isn’t creative or strategy.

It’s trust.

👉 Download the Deliverability Recovery Framework

Whether you implement it internally or want help applying it, this framework will give you clarity on what’s happening — and a responsible way forward.

‍